Local Agenda 21



Regardless of whether or how it was used in practice,
(policy usually precedes practice, often by decades) ... 

Local Agenda 21 & the other Rio'92 documents represent 
a milestone in global (second-tier?) consciousness, and it is
well worth getting familiar with them and their story.  

These policy documents were agreed by some 54 governments 
and are actually quite radical in content, certainly compared to the 
general world-views of the time,  for the first time uniting 
concerns which were (still are) traditionally treated as separate 
(poverty, injustice, ill-health & environmental degradation),
with a more integrated (systemic) understanding.




Agenda 21

Preamble


1.1. Humanity stands at a defining moment in history

We are confronted with a perpetuation of disparities between and within nations, a worsening of poverty, hunger, ill health and illiteracy, and the continuing deterioration of the ecosystems on which we depend for our well-being. 

However, integration of environment and development concerns and greater attention to them will lead to the fulfilment of basic needs, improved living standards for all, better protected and managed ecosystems and a safer, more prosperous future

No nation can achieve this on its own; but together we can - in a global partnership for sustainable development.


1.2. This global partnership must build on the premises of General Assembly resolution 44/228 of 22 December 1989, which was adopted when the nations of the world called for the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, and on the acceptance of the need to take a balanced and integrated approach to environment and development questions.


1.3. Agenda 21 addresses the pressing problems of today and also aims at preparing the world for the challenges of the next century. 

It reflects a global consensus and political commitment at the highest level on development and environment cooperation. 

Its successful implementation is first and foremost the responsibility of Governments. 

National strategies, plans, policies and processes are crucial in achieving this. International cooperation should support and supplement such national efforts. 

In this context, the United Nations system has a key role to play. 

Other international, regional and subregional organizations are also called upon to contribute to this effort. 

The broadest public participation and the active involvement of the non-governmental organizations and other groups should also be encouraged.


...


See full document attached


Agenda 21.pdf



Agenda 21 as a Conspiracy

Interestingly, Local Agenda 21 has been criticized both by some environmentalists, for paying lip-service to environmental restoration whilst promoting a continuing capitalist growth agenda, as well as by those who are all for keeping the industrial growth agenda firmly in place. 

http://chalcedon.edu/research/articles/agenda-21-how-the-u-n-reaches-into-your-home-town/This is an example of the latter, a quote from an article about a book called "Behind the Green Mask":


The stated purpose of Agenda 21 is "
to protect the rights of future generations and all species against the potential crimes of the present" (p. 8).

Are They Crazy, Or Just Dangerous?

Let's pause to consider that extraordinary statement.

What are the rights of "all species"? Do locusts, for instance, have a right to devour our crops? Where are these rights enumerated? Are all species created equal, men and tsetse flies alike? Are our rights to be "balanced" against the rights of bacteria?

What is the difference between real crimes and "potential crimes"? What is a potential crime? Where are the statutes that define and list potential crimes? Who will enforce unwritten laws against crimes that haven't been committed yet? How would you know you have committed a potential crime, until you've been arrested for it?

Do we honestly want to get involved in this kind of Alice in Wonderland jurisprudence?

These concepts are indeed amorphous, and indeed apt to be continuously redefined without warning. In fact, they are without any hard and fast meanings at all.

That makes them dangerous.


Two other articles

click on images

http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2013/07/agenda-21-simply-explained-2678632.html

http://ethischbeleggen.com/opgepast-marxist-in-vermomming/







Origins

The publication of Our Common Future and the work of the World Commission on Environment and Development laid the groundwork for the convening of the 1992 Earth Summit and the adoption of Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration and to the establishment of the Commission on Sustainable Development.


https://regenerationchampions.wordpress.com/frameworks/

An oft-quoted definition of sustainable development is defined in the report as:

"development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."

In addition, key contributions of Our Common Future to the concept of sustainable development include the recognition that the many crises facing the planet are interlocking crises that are elements of a single crisis of the whole [3] and 


of the vital need for the active participation of all sectors of society in consultation and decisions relating to sustainable development.


The Brudtland Commission

Our Common Future is also known as the Brundtland Report in recognition of former Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland's role as Chair of the World Commission on Environment and Development.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gro_Harlem_Brundtland


Also see

The Brundtland_Commission




Ċ
Agenda21.pdf
(1068k)
Stella Ne,
8 May 2016, 01:33